BountyJobs.Com…The New Frontier Of Recruiting? Part 2

It’s taken me about 6 months to begin writing this piece because just when I was about to start, BountyJobs upgraded some features and I wanted to be able to test drive them before commenting. I guess that’s what it’s all about….always be in Beta.

So this post will deal with the initial signing up on BountyJobs as an “Employer”. I won’t go into signing up as a “Headhunter” because I don’t operate in this space, but I will tell you that I have two Headhunter friends who had a VERY difficult time getting ahold of someone at BountyJobs to sign up. No return calls or emails. They have since signed up, but it wasn’t easy.

Now on to the concept for those of you who haven’t used BountyJobs.Com before. The idea for me was simple: Centralized Vendor Management.

BountyJobs.Com gives you a chance to work with multiple vendors, outside of your preferred suppliers, without having to sign a new contract, do an intake call, tell them about your company, blah-blah-blah…the whole new recruiter song & dance. Some companies actually use BountyJobs to manage ALL of their vendor activity (or so I’m told). So the potential here to save time is great, but let’s go further to see if it really does….

BountyJobs makes you sign their master search firm agreement which is similar to whatever you use, but outlines that they are the middleman and assume no risk but will process the payments and take a cut of each one — from the pocket of the Headhunter. And the cool part is, you get to set the fee: 15%, 20%, whatever. So you can actually cut fees without having to negotiate contracts with Headhunters. If they want to work on your job at 10% they will. If not, they work on other jobs. By the way - you can ask BountyJobs to add into their contract some of your legal terms and they will. Everything is negotiable…just the way a free market should be. It took us a couple months to customize the agreement but that was our process not theirs.

Once we were up and running they were helpful in getting our first 10 jobs posted on the system. They push for you to put multiple jobs because the more that get filled, the more money they make. That’s the model.

I was excited when the Headhunters started requesting the right to work on my open jobs. I’ve used a lot of similar services like Guru.Com and it’s always exciting when the bids start rolling in.

Although I loved the concept and the ease of use, as soon as the bids started coming in I started to notice a key flaw in this whole idea — the quality of the Headhunters will make or break my experience.

It was really clear to me from the start that some Headhunters were thorough in the explanations of who they were and why they wanted to source candidates for us, and then others didn’t provide any information. But that’s where my right to choose comes in. Since it’s an open market, I get to select which companies (or independent recruiters) to work with and which one’s will get the “rejection notice”. It’s kind of like selecting candidates in my applicant tracking system. And if I really wanted to be picky (and had the time) I could call and interview each vendor — but that’s not the point here. The point here was to save time and make it a more efficient process.

This was the experience I had on the first day of use with BountyJobs.Com. My next post will include more details on days that followed. As always…stay tuned.

The opinions expressed on this blog are mine and mine alone and do not reflect the opinions of my employer.

BountyJobs.Com…The New Frontier Of Recruiting?

There are a lot of bloggers out there that like to be the first person to announce a new and cool technology for recruiting. I love those folks because they help me stay abreast of the ever-changing face of recruiting technology. I, on the other hand, think of myself as an in-depth end-user so when I write about something, I’ve used it thoroughly and can give my unbiased opinion about whether it worked for me or not.

So having said that…BountyJobs.Com is by no means a new technology and I’m not the first to write about it. But I will say that I’m probably the first to write an indepth piece about how it works or doesn’t work for employers and recruiters. While it’s not new, I think it’s a Web 2.0 concept that’s underutilized amongst my peers.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

I always get excited when I find out about a new recruiting technology that makes sense to me within the first 15 seconds of hearing about it. That doesn’t happen often when you’re dealing with Web 2.0 technologies.

So about a year ago, I started hearing about this BountyJobs thing and I must admit I ignored it because I thought the advertisements were kind of cheesy and their name needed some work….but overall — I wasn’t ready for another “Job Site”. I ended up learning more about BountyJobs.Com on a PodCast and wanted more info. At the same time, I found out through my employer that one of their sales reps had been hounding her to sign up. Finally, she reluctantly set up a conference call and asked me to sit in - because I’m in to this kind of stuff.

Within a few minutes I was sold on the idea but my boss was not. You see, when you work at a big company, you tend to think about “legal” first before you think about “innovation”. Plus she was having a bad day. Long story short, after 2 months of back-and-forth through “legal” we finalized the “master agreement” and signed up. More on that later…

The next few posts will take you through the “back end” of BountyJobs.Com from an employer’s perspective. I’ll tell you the good, the bad and the ugly from the inside out.

Web 3.0 Recruiting Not There Yet

I spent the last couple months really digging deep into the candidate side of Web 3.0 job hunting and I have to admit, I’m just not convinced that it’s ready for “prime time”. There is some great thinking and some great technology behind the existing players like Jobfox, Climber and Vitruva, but I’ve asked around, I’ve played with them and I’ve read some other blogs — I just can’t seem to find large numbers of individuals who have found success.

Now as much as people bash the “big boards” like Monster and Careerbuilder, I still think they’re an effective means of sourcing for internal corporate recruiters and a good way of finding jobs for job seekers. I work “on the inside” and the majority of our hires come from this method. I get an endless supply of emails and mailers about technologies that claim to “revolutionize” recruiting and I aim to check them all out because I have an open mind. My Agency connections tell me all this stuff is junk, but don’t kid yourself Agency Recruiters…that’s where you’re getting your candidates from too. I know this because I ask all my Agency candidates how they were found. I’ll address that in my next post on Open Market Recruiting.

Don’t get me wrong here, I’m not giving up on this technology. In fact, I have high hopes. The ideal situation would be a MERGER between the big boards and a provider of this 3.0 matching technology because the problem is not that the technology doesn’t work, there’s just not enough people using it. The sign-up takes too long and the number of companies putting their jobs on the site is too low. That’s a recipe for candidate and company abandonment.

So for now, I’ll leave this topic and move on to an area of Social Media Recruiting that I’ve been studying quite intensely for the last 3 months….Open Market Recruiting. I’ll take a look at BountyJobs.Com, Dayak.Com and if anyone else has any suggestions of other companies to review…please let me know. Thanks!

Taking a Twitter Vacation

I’ve officially decided to take a vacation from Twitter until they upgrade their servers to handle the traffic. I see great value and potential in the technology as a recruiting tool and I’ve seen my list of followers grow, but I’m a fairly busy guy and when I log in, I expect the technology to work and many times recently it has been over-loaded. I must admit though, the cute picture they use to notify me that the servers are overloaded tends to calm me down, but it’s only momentary.

Internal Alumni Social Networks Have Recruiting Value

Alumni of an organization long have been recognized as sources of new business and employee referrals, as well as for their potential roles as customers and rehired employees. Maintaining these relationships for life and connecting alumni electronically, with each other and with current employees, can escalate these benefits by fostering connectivity and information flow.

For example, KPMG set up a corporate alumni social network in the spring of 2007, aiming to better connect current and former employees, keep them up to date on corporate news, events and job openings, foster a more collaborative environment, and provide KPMG executives with an easy way to stay in touch with former employees.

KPMG has signed up approximately 10,000 former and current employees on its corporate social network. KPMG credits its network with helping it hire 137 former employees, or around 14 percent of the company’s total hires, since the network’s launch, up from 72 people in the three months prior. This increase in the number of rehires delivers significant benefits to the organization — from cost savings to productivity improvements and increased goodwill among employees.

Additional benefits include access to the knowledge experienced alumni hold, the ability to inform opinions and discussions alumni have about the organization, and the potential to create positive impressions for individuals who may remain shareholders or customers of the organization. Such brand ambassadorship, whether for an organization’s employment or corporate brand, can have substantive results.

Click Here For The Full Article


Bookmark and Share

Next Page »